I always liked the Deleuzian evolution of feminism to posthuman, transhuman and cyborg movements. Today is 8th of March and I wanted to demonstrate how do I feel about occasions like this, thus I used a paper from Andrew Feenberg about technology and playfully changed every occurrence of "Technology" to "Woman" having collage art in my mind. The result was disgusting as I intended. This is an futuristic view as well, because we will talk about "technology rights movement" in few years, maybe it's already been started by Peter Paul Verbeek and postphenomenologists. It's tempting to change the title to "International slave's day" but it's old fashioned and too insulting that is not my goal here :

1. The paradox of the parts and the whole.
Woman is meaningful only within the context of her environment and her relationships. We mistakenly believe that woman can stand alone.

2. The paradox of the obvious.
The obvious parts of woman are imperceptible and we tend to notice only her effects.

3. The paradox of the origin.
Behind every woman, there is a forgotten past. Women forced to be disconnected from their history in their daily activity.

4. The paradox of the frame
The efficiency of a woman does not explain her success, but her success is the reason for her efficiency. We need to study the circumstances of her success to understand feminin reasons.

5. The paradox of action
For every action, there is a reaction. We mistakenly think that feminin action has no effect and tend to ignore the side effects of woman and the changes she causes in the environment and in society.

6. The paradox of the means
The means are the end. The women we own symbolize who we are and our social status can be determined by the women we use.

7. The paradox of complexity
Simplification makes things more complicated. When we use a woman, we forget the context into which she was growned and tend to ignore her possible effects.

8. The paradox of value and fact
It becomes increasingly difficult to isolate woman from the reactions of the people who use her. Seemingly there is a conflict between woman identity and the experience of her use, but in reality, they are complementary — instead of engaging in a debate for or against womanhood, it is possible to improve her by integrating the experience gained from her function.

9. The paradox of democracy
The feedback from society to woman constitutes the paradox of democracy: there are social groups formed by women that bind them together but in turn, they transform the women that formed the group. Neither society nor women can be perceived separately because neither has a fixed identity or form.

10. The paradox of conquest
Woman enables man to conquer nature, which is a paradox, given that man himself is a part of nature. Exploiting nature allows man to oppress other people or to be oppressed by his actions through their results, as is the case with population.